Jury deliberating in trial of rancher accused of killing unarmed migrant (2024)

\n'; $('#tucson-subscription-list').html(html);//window.offerhtmltest = html;//console.log(html); }//console.log(data); } }); } break; } } else { __tnt.log('LEE: free view'); if(!__tnt.user.services){ __tnt.trackEvent({ 'category': 'subscription', 'action': 'free view', 'label': 'under subscription limit', 'value': 1 }); __tnt.trackEvent({ 'category': 'registration', 'action': 'free view', 'label': 'under registration limit', 'value': 1 }); } } }; if (gSP_data !== false && typeof(gSP_data) == 'object') TNCMS.Access.checkAccess(checkfunc); else gSP_queue.push(function(){ TNCMS.Access.checkAccess(checkfunc); }); });

Prosecutors say Cuen Buitimea and a friend, Daniel Ramirez, who testified in the trial, went to the U.S. in search of roofing work that day. The pair was traveling with a larger group of migrants when they encountered Border Patrol agents. The group scattered, and Cuen Buitimea and Ramirez fled towards the U.S.-Mexico border, crossing through Kelly’s property.

“Gabriel was judged that day and sentenced to death by the defendant,” said Jette, who is deputy county attorney for Santa Cruz County and is running for Pima County attorney.

Jette asked jurors to consider how a “reasonable person” would behave in Kelly’s situation, when deciding whether he’s guilty of second-degree murder.

“When you see two unarmed migrants walking southbound, beyond two fence lines, and you take your AK-47 and walk out and don’t say a word, point it at them and shoot, would that be what a reasonable person would do in that situation?” he said. “The answer has to be no.”

Court records show Cuen Buitimea had previously entered the U.S. illegally several times and was deported, most recently in 2016, according to the AP.

Throughout the trial, the jury heard from multiple witnesses, including Kelly’s wife Wanda who testified that on the day of the shooting, she saw two men with rifles and wearing backpacks pass their ranch home. She did not hear the gunshot Kelly said he heard.

The jury also heard from Ramirez, a Honduran national who had known Cuen Buitimea for about a year. Kelly is also facing a charge of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon against Ramirez.

The defense highlighted inconsistencies in Ramirez’s testimony, such as telling investigators that he and Cuen Buitimea were west of Nogales instead of east, and that they were much closer to the border, and to Kelly’s ranch house, than where Cuen Buitimea’s body was found.

“What does that mean? It means he wasn’t there,” Larkin said. “It means he is telling a story. Why? We don’t know. But you can’t be there and get it this wrong. It is not possible.”

Prosecutors sought to portray the inaccurate statements as understandable, coming from the traumatized victim of a crime, who had just seen his friend get killed and was nervous talking to law enforcement.

Prosecutor Jette said Ramirez’ most relevant statements were consistent with the facts, and proved he was there, such as his description of Kelly’s red horse and his recollection that Cuen Buitimea grabbed his chest after he was shot, before falling face forward to the ground.

Prosecutors displayed a photo of Cuen Buitimea’s body, after investigators had rolled him onto his back, showing his right hand still pressed to his blood-soaked shirt.

Larkin maintained that prosecutors failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

“It’s not justice for Gabriel to hold the wrong person accountable for his death,” Larkin told the jury at the end of her closing statement. “If you decide we don’t really know what happened here, that means the verdict must be ‘not guilty.’ … And the fact is, we’re probably never going to know what happened to Gabriel, and we won’t know because the investigation in this case jumped to conclusions.”

Judge Fink excused the jury to begin deliberations at 2:40 p.m. Thursday.